I am a Yankees fan. I support their mindset: win at any costs (taken literally). If you have to spend X dollars to do so, do it. But I do not support acquiring Roy Halladay and subsequently signing him.
I cannot stand it when people speak disparagingly about the Yankees buying players, championships, etc. Didn’t Texas buy Alex Rodriguez with $252 million? Didn’t Boston buy Manny Ramirez with $160 million? Johan Santana and the Mets? Alfonso Soriano and the Cubs? You get the picture.
All that being said, those are isolated incidents. These teams didn’t pay exorbitant sums to multiple players. The Yankees, on the other hand, have four of the five richest contracts in sports history.
Giving the best pitcher in baseball—and he just may be—a contract upwards of $150 million will sway my opinion of the Yankees. Derek Jeter is homegrown and Alex Rodriguez was traded for (and subsequently given the largest contract ever), so I do not mind those actions. But in the wake of signing CC Sabathia and Mark Teixeira, the signing of Roy Halladay would only paint the Yankees in a worse light.
If you’ve read this blog before, you know I support anything the Yankees do. Trading for, and then buying Roy Halladay… that I do not support.
Arizona Diamondbacks pitcher Dan Haren received one third-place vote for the National League Cy Young Award. And that’s it. He finished fifth, behind Javier Vazquez, Adam Wainwright, Chris Carpenter and Tim Lincecum.
Haren was 14-10 with a 3.14 ERA over 229.1 innings. He had a 1.003 WHIP (led the League) and a 5.87 SO/BB (led the League). It is not his fault that he pitched for the third worst team in the National League.
Haren was the Cy Young favorite at mid-season: on July 10, he led the majors with 130 IP, 2.01 ERA, .81 WHIP, .189 OBA and a 8.1. SO/BB. A poor second half clearly destroyed those numbers.
But Haren had no support. His offense was terrible, his defense was sub-par and he did not have usually dependable Brandon Webb to take some of the load. He did it all himself (what helped Zack Greinke, as well). Carpenter and Wainwright had each other. Lincecum had Matt Cain. Vazquez had Derek Lowe and Tim Hudson, among others.
I’m not saying Haren deserved to win the Award; Lincecum clearly did. Moreover, Carpenter deserved it over Haren, too. I just cannot believe this guy got one lousy third place vote for his spectacular season.
Zack Greinke took home the American League Cy Young award yesterday, besting Felix Hernandez. I find it very disconcerting that he was not the unanimous choice. Two first place votes went to Hernandez, and one to Justin Verlander. That being said, Greinke won by a very wide margin.
What he did this season was incredible: win a Cy Young for a team with a .401 winning percentage—the lowest such for any AL Cy Young winner. A horrible team, combined with a horrific infield, granted Greinke just 16 wins, the lowest ever for an AL winner.
But the rest of Greinke’s stats were undeniably incredible: a 2.16 ERA over 229.1 innings, with a 1.07 WHIP and 4.75 SO/BB. Hernandez, despite his three more wins, had an ERA of 2.49, a 1.14 WHIP and a 3.06 SO/BB. His more wins were a product of his playing for a better team: the Mariners finished above .500: .525.
How could you not give it Greinke?
Verlander’s ERA was 3.45. Already, he is not deserving when compared to Greinke (and even Hernandez). His WHIP was 1.18, and he completed half as many games as the winner. But, he did strike out 10.1 batters per nine innings and lead the League in strikeouts with 269. Regardless, he pitched for a playoff contention team: he had offense. Greinke had to do everything by himself.
The Royals won just 17 of his 33 starts. Nobody came close to deserving this award more than Greinke, and rightfully so.
It’s not even a debate: Tim Lincecum outright deserves the 2009 National League Cy Young award.
He finished third in innings pitched at 225.1, behind Dan Haren with 229.1 and Adam Wainwright with 233. That being said, each of those pitchers started more games than Lincecum.
He finished second in ERA to Chris Carpenter. He was 2.48, Carpenter was 2.24. Lincecum started four more games than Carpenter. Anything can happen in four starts: Carpenter’s ERA might not have necessarily finished above Lincecum’s but odds are it certainly would have been higher than 2.24.
Nobody came close to Lincecum in strikeouts (261). The next closest was Javier Vazquez at 238. Lincecum, along with teammate Matt Cain, led the League in complete games (four). Batters hit just .206 off Lincecum; .226 on Carpenter.
Statistically, it’s not close: Lincecum is the winner. Moreover, he pitched for a poorer offense in the Giants than say the Cardinals, for example. He couldn’t rely on the likes of Albert Pujols or Matt Holliday to bail him out in the seventh inning; he had to do everything himself.
It will be a crime if he does not win his second Cy Young award.
John Lackey is the obvious premiere pitcher on the free agent market this winter. Although he is 31 years old, he is going to command quite a contract.
A few knocks on Lackey:
He has a career WHIP of 1.31. He has tossed just 163.1 and 176.1 innings the past two in 2008 and 2009, respectively. He won 19 games in 2007 but otherwise has never won more than 14 games in a season. And, more politically, he has made just one All-Star team and received Cy Young votes just once.
But Lackey is a bulldog; we all saw him yelling at manager Mike Scioscia against the Yankees when he was being taken out. Moreover, he averages 219 innings for every 34 starts. So, if healthy, you can pencil him in for 200+ innings a year.
Alas, that’s the thing: Lackey has not been healthy—51 starts over the last two seasons. And he’s already 31. Do you really want to give him a five-year deal for around $15 million a year?
You have to. Lackey does not put up jaw-dropping numbers on a yearly basis, but he gives you remarkable consistency. He eats innings and, although he gets hit hard, he keeps his team in the game. And he’s post-season proven.
This guy is going to get paid. Whichever team does it will be richly rewarded.
The Detroit Tigers have made it very clear that they are willing to trade centerfielder Curtis Granderson. The speedy lefthanded hitter is coming off a year in which he made his first All-Star team despite hitting just .249/.327/.453; his OPS was .780. He did slug 30 homeruns and steal 20 bags, but he struck out 141 times and drew just 72 walks—not a great ratio for a guy who should be leading off.
But that is what has become apparent with Granderson: he is not a leadoff hitter. He’s a mid-level power hitter. And he can steal a little.
And he can’t hit lefties for his life. Last year he hit an abysmal .183/.245/.239 with an OPS of .484 off southpaws. Yes, his slugging percentage was actually lower than his on-base percentage: first time in the history of forever.
The Yankees, Angels and Cubs are rumored to be going after him, with the Yankees leading the charge. They should stay away, however. If they were to make a deal for Granderson, they would have to work out a platoon situation in which he would sit against lefties. You cannot send him up there with a .183 average.
And the Angels have to be crazy to consider this deal. With Torii Hunter locked up and the re-signing of Bobby Abreu, they are fine. They should simply focus on retaining Chone Figgins, who is an overall better player.
In fact, that’s who the Yankees should be going after.
With Matt Holliday now officially a free agent, agent Scott Boras is touting him as a ‘complete player,’ worthy of a Mark Teixeira-like contract. Boras calls him one of “less than 30 franchise players” in the majors. He might be one of the 30 best hitters in baseball, but he is by no means a franchise player.
Did you know Holliday has hit 30 homeruns just twice? He has driven in 100 runs just three times?
Holliday, who has spent most of his career in Colorado, is a career .351 hitter at home; .284 on the road. Not a terrible average by any means, but it certainly shows how Colorado has affected his overall numbers.
If you look at his splits, his batting average does not change much by month or game situation. He is a well-rounded, clutch hitter. He’s just simply not a complete player, to use Boras’ language. He’s not a great fielder and he doesn’t draw many walks. Yes, he doesn’t strike out that much for someone with his power, and he is indeed capable of stealing bases, but he is definitely a flawed player in several respects.
During his time in Oakland this past season, he saw his power drop: despite a .284 average, he hit 11 homeruns in 93 games. When traded to St. Louis, he hit 13 in 63. This says one of two things: Holliday either does not play well for losing teams or he does not hit well in the American League.
So who is going to cough up $20 million a year for this guy? All the teams that can afford him, for the most part, already have a ‘franchise player.’ And a lot of these teams are in the AL. And some of them are rebuilding and may endure a sub-par season.
Holliday is not a franchise player. He is a backup. He should stay in St. Louis and play second fiddle to Albert Pujols.